From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MORA v. MAASS

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 18, 1994
319 Or. 570 (Or. 1994)

Opinion

CC 91C-10360; CA A71969 (Control), CC 91C-11530; CA A71954; SC S40263, CC 91C-11061; CA A71982, CC 91C-10445; CA A71983; SC S40286 (Cases Consolidated)

Argued and submitted January 4, 1994

Affirmed August 11, 1994 Reconsideration denied October 18, 1994

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeals from Marion County Circuit Court, Rodney W. Miller, Judge. 120 Or. App. 173, 851 P.2d 1154 (1993).

Mark J. Geiger, Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review James Anthony Craiger.

Ronald M. Hellewell, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review Joaquin S. Teran.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on a response to the petitions were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, and Graber, Justices.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Affirmed by an equally divided court.


Summaries of

MORA v. MAASS

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 18, 1994
319 Or. 570 (Or. 1994)
Case details for

MORA v. MAASS

Case Details

Full title:LUIS ERNESTO MORA, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 18, 1994

Citations

319 Or. 570 (Or. 1994)
877 P.2d 641

Citing Cases

Zornes v. State

A petition for post-conviction relief is the exclusive means for addressing the lawfulness of a criminal…

Wilkins v. Frink

ORS 138.540 (1) provides that, subject to exceptions not applicable to this case, a petition filed pursuant…