From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 18, 1977
234 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53571.

ARGUED MARCH 7, 1977.

DECIDED MARCH 18, 1977.

Nontax-paid whiskey; motion to suppress. Fulton Criminal Court. Before Judge Tucker.

Nadler, Gold Beskin, Howard A. Gold, for appellant.

Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Frank A. Bowers, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.


The defendant was charged with possession of untaxed spirits. He appeals from the denial of a motion to suppress the contraband, which he claims was illegally seized. A certificate for immediate review was obtained from the trial court and an appeal entered in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court transferred the case to this court.

Because the trial court's order is not subject to direct review, this court would have jurisdiction only if the defendant complied with the requirements for interlocutory review set out in Code Ann. § 6-701 (a)2 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073; 1975, pp. 757, 758). Those requirements were not met in that neither appellate court granted permission for the appeal. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to decide this appeal and it must be dismissed. Bank of Commerce v. Williams, 138 Ga. App. 666 ( 227 S.E.2d 95).

Appeal dismissed. Marshall and Shulman, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MARCH 7, 1977 — DECIDED MARCH 18, 1977.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 18, 1977
234 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:MOORE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 18, 1977

Citations

234 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
234 S.E.2d 186

Citing Cases

Whatley v. Blue Cross of Georgia/Columbus, Inc.

See generally Daughtrey v. Daughtrey, 233 Ga. 83 ( 210 S.E.2d 3) (1974). There being no grant of an…

State v. Tuzman

Case No. 54375 5. Tuzman did not follow the proper procedure to obtain a review of the denial of his motion…