From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Sayers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

January, 1930.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Chemung County.


Whatever may be proved when the issues in this action are brought to trial, there is nothing in the pleadings and affidavits contained in the record that shows sufficient ground for the exercise of judicial discretion in granting a temporary injunction. ( Reformed P.D. Church v. M.A. Building Co., 214 N.Y. 268; McLean v. Woolworth Co., 204 App. Div. 118; affd., 236 N.Y. 612; Whitridge v. Park, 100 Misc. 367; affd., on opinion below, 179 App. Div. 884.) Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for an injunction pendente lite denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Moore v. Sayers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Moore v. Sayers

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD MOORE and Another, Respondents, v. DAVID SAYERS and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)