From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Milusnic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2014
NO. CV 13-7024-PSG (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 13-7024-PSG (MAN)

09-08-2014

TIMOTHY LAMONT MOORE, Petitioner, v. LOUIS MILUSNIC, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: September 8, 2014.

/s/__________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Milusnic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2014
NO. CV 13-7024-PSG (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Moore v. Milusnic

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY LAMONT MOORE, Petitioner, v. LOUIS MILUSNIC, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 13-7024-PSG (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Glanton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Moreover, Petitioner is not entitled to credit for this time period because he received credit for that time…