From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Gregory

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Jun 15, 2007
Civil Action No. 7:06-cv-00546 (W.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:06-cv-00546.

June 15, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Chad Douglas Moore brings this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the he was subjected to an excessive use of force, correctional officers failed to protect him from that excessive use of force, his bodily privacy was violated when his genitals were exposed to female prison officers via video, various defendants failed to investigate the alleged excessive use of force, and he was held in cruel and unusual living conditions. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, and the court referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski for a report and recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge subsequently filed a report, finding genuine issues of material fact as to Moore's excessive force and failure to protect claims, but no genuine issues of material fact as to his claims of failure to investigate the alleged excessive use of excessive force, invasion of bodily privacy, and cruel and unusual living conditions. The Magistrate Judge recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part and the remaining issues be set for trial. Both the plaintiff and the defendants filed objections within the ten days allotted under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), reiterating the arguments made in their respective pleadings. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the objections thereto, and all relevant portions of the record de novo in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
a. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with regard to plaintiff's claims of failure to investigate the alleged excessive use of excessive force, invasion of bodily privacy, and cruel and unusual living conditions; Accordingly, these claims shall be and hereby are DISMISSED;
b. Defendants Christy Boyers, Larry Dull, Eric Young, John Craig, and Randy Fisher are DISMISSED as defendants to this action and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE these defendants from this action;
c. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED with regard to plaintiff's claims of excessive force and failure to protect;
3. Accordingly, only plaintiff's claim of excessive force against defendant Gregory and his claim of failure to protect against defendants Bosserman and Cross shall go forward;
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to set this matter for trial in the Harrisonburg Division before a seven-member jury on the remaining claims.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to the plaintiff.


Summaries of

Moore v. Gregory

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Jun 15, 2007
Civil Action No. 7:06-cv-00546 (W.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Moore v. Gregory

Case Details

Full title:CHAD DOUGLAS MOORE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID O. GREGORY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

Date published: Jun 15, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:06-cv-00546 (W.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2007)

Citing Cases

Muhammad v. Fleming

"[P]rison officials clearly have an overriding security interest and responsibility in maintaining safety and…

Miller v. Clarke

Additionally, plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to an investigation of the incident. See e.g.,…