From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Blaine

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 14, 2005
Civil Action No. 01-1306 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 14, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 01-1306.

September 14, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 13, 2001, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Ila Jeanne Sensenich for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The case was returned to District Judge William Standish for trial. Defendants filed a successive motion for summary judgment on October 5, 2004. The case was then referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on October 6, 2004.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 98), filed on July 15, 2005, recommended that the complaint in the above captioned case be dismissed for failure to prosecute this action. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections to the report and recommendation. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated July 15, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Moore v. Blaine

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 14, 2005
Civil Action No. 01-1306 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Moore v. Blaine

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD X. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. CONNER BLAINE, JR., Superintendent; PAUL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 14, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 01-1306 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 14, 2005)

Citing Cases

Fletcher v. Washington and Lee University

" (Emphasis suppl.) The omitted language indicates that the statute of descents in effect in 1920 (Va. Code…

Broward v. Broward

Only two generations or classes of inheritors in direct line are postulated here, and no question of…