From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore Scott v. Industrial Acc. Com

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Mar 25, 1918
36 Cal.App. 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2467.

March 25, 1918.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Redman Alexander, for Petitioner.

Christopher M. Bradley, for Respondents.


The award of the Industrial Accident Commission in this case must be annulled upon the following considerations:

Michael Higgins, employed as a bolter-up within the hull of a ship in the course of construction at the Moore Scott Iron Works, left his employment for the purpose of going to his lunch; he went by an unusual route, and undertook to go down a scaffolding and ladder on the outside of the ship — a means not intended for his use in leaving the ship at any time — another and perfectly safe method of exit having been provided by his employers. In doing so he lost his hold and fell, and was killed.

Upon these facts it must be held that the death of Higgins did not take place in the course of his employment; nor was he at the time of the accident performing any service growing out of or incidental to his employment, nor acting within the course thereof. ( Fitzgerald v. Clarke Son, 1 B. W. C. C. [Eng.] 197.)

The findings of the commission to the effect that he might have been leaving his work for the purpose of getting more bolts for use therein, or for the purpose of getting fresh air, seem to us to rest upon nothing but conjecture. There is no evidence in the record to sustain them. The fresh air, if he needed it, could have been obtained in a perfectly safe place upon the deck of the vessel, and nearer to the point of his immediate employment than the scaffolding from which he fell, and there seem to have been no bolts or other material necessary to his work to be obtained at the place toward which he was going. It is certain from this record, it seems to us, that he was, as has been said, simply abandoning his work before the hour when he was permitted to leave it.

The award is annulled.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 24, 1918.


Summaries of

Moore Scott v. Industrial Acc. Com

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Mar 25, 1918
36 Cal.App. 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

Moore Scott v. Industrial Acc. Com

Case Details

Full title:MOORE SCOTT IRON WORKS (a Corporation), et al., Petitioners, v. INDUSTRIAL…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Mar 25, 1918

Citations

36 Cal.App. 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
172 P. 1114

Citing Cases

Honda v. Higa

In support of their theory the majority rely on the Moore Scott Iron Works case, the Inland Steel Company…

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

[4] It is true, as contended by petitioner, that when an employee chooses for his own conveyance a hazardous…