From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore Dry Dock Co. v. Pillsbury

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 1938
98 F.2d 115 (9th Cir. 1938)

Opinion

No. 8600.

July 7, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Michael H. Roche, Judge.

Suit by the Moore Dry Dock Company against Warren H. Pillsbury, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees' Compensation Commission for the 13th Compensation District, and others. From an order refusing an application for an interlocutory injunction, the plaintiff appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Emmet Cashin and Harold M. Sawyer, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., and S.P. Murman, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Pillsbury.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order refusing an application for an interlocutory injunction. The order was entered on June 10, 1937. This appeal was taken on June 25, 1937. Thereafter the case proceeded to final hearing, and on November 22, 1937, the District Court entered a final decree dismissing the bill of complaint. An appeal from the final decree was taken on February 1, 1938, and is now pending in this court. Hence, the first mentioned appeal should be dismissed. Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378, 386, 53 S.Ct. 190, 191, 77 L.Ed. 375; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U.S. 210, 224, 52 S.Ct. 559, 561, 76 L.Ed. 1062, 86 A.L.R. 403; Pacific Telephone Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall, 265 U.S. 196, 205, 44 S.Ct. 553, 556, 68 L.Ed. 975; Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 44, 40 S.Ct. 221, 222, 64 L.Ed. 445.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Moore Dry Dock Co. v. Pillsbury

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 1938
98 F.2d 115 (9th Cir. 1938)
Case details for

Moore Dry Dock Co. v. Pillsbury

Case Details

Full title:MOORE DRY DOCK CO. v. PILLSBURY et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 7, 1938

Citations

98 F.2d 115 (9th Cir. 1938)

Citing Cases

United States v. City of Chicago

Peterson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 268 F.2d 567, 568 (7th Cir. 1959). See also…

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Okin

The Commission has moved to dismiss the appeals from these two orders because on May 18, 1943, after trial of…