From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 25, 1986
495 So. 2d 110 (Ala. 1986)

Opinion

85-1035.

July 25, 1986.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Martha Gail Ingram, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Kathleen M. Warren, Gadsden, for respondent.


In its petition for certiorari, the State maintains that in reversing the defendant's conviction the Court of Criminal Appeals, 495 So.2d 104 erred, because, the State says, defense counsel, on cross-examination of witness Eastland, failed to lay a proper predicate before attempting to show bias. The State argues that defense counsel was required to question Eastland about the state of her feelings toward the defendant before asking her if she had been indicted on drug charges. However, such an inquiry is not a condition precedent to questioning an adverse witness concerning matters tending to show his or her bias toward the defendant. Wells v. State, 292 Ala. 256, 292 So.2d 471 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON and BEATTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moody v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 25, 1986
495 So. 2d 110 (Ala. 1986)
Case details for

Moody v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte State of Alabama. (Re Louie Clayton MOODY, alias v. STATE)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 25, 1986

Citations

495 So. 2d 110 (Ala. 1986)

Citing Cases

Stokes v. State

Doubts in the court's mind as to whether to allow wide-ranging cross-examination should usually be resolved…

Baker v. State

The right of cross-examination is guaranteed to an accused by the Sixth Amendment of the United States…