From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. Gates

United States District Court, N.D. Florida
May 12, 2008
CASE NO. 3:07cv410/RS-MD (N.D. Fla. May. 12, 2008)

Summary

In Moody, the plaintiff was not challenging the revocation of her security clearance, but rather was challenging the Department of Defense's decision to designate her position as one requiring such a clearance.

Summary of this case from Murphy v. McHugh

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07cv410/RS-MD.

May 12, 2008


ORDER


Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24). Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and is incorporated in this Order.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) is granted.
3. This case is dismissed with prejudice because of lack of subject matter.
4. The clerk is directed to close the file.
ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moody v. Gates

United States District Court, N.D. Florida
May 12, 2008
CASE NO. 3:07cv410/RS-MD (N.D. Fla. May. 12, 2008)

In Moody, the plaintiff was not challenging the revocation of her security clearance, but rather was challenging the Department of Defense's decision to designate her position as one requiring such a clearance.

Summary of this case from Murphy v. McHugh
Case details for

Moody v. Gates

Case Details

Full title:LICIA A. MOODY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Department of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07cv410/RS-MD (N.D. Fla. May. 12, 2008)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. McHugh

But that argument is fatally flawed for this reason: it implicates security clearance matters and this court…