From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Nowell

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 22, 1931
183 Ark. 1116 (Ark. 1931)

Opinion

Opinion delivered June 22, 1931.

OFFICERS — SUSPENSION FOR ACTS DONE PRIOR TO TERM. — Crawford Moses' Dig., 10,335 providing for suspension of an officer on presentment or indictment for certain causes including malfeasance in office, does not provide for suspension of an officer on being indicted for official misconduct during a prior term of office.

Certiorari to Faulkner Circuit Court; W. J. Waggoner, Judge; writ granted.

R. W. Robins and George F. Hartje, for petitioner.


H. W. Montgomery seeks to have quashed by this court an order of the circuit court of Faulkner County by which he was suspended from office as circuit clerk and recorder of Faulkner County, and R. A. Nowell temporarily appointed to fill the vacancy.

The record shows that H. W. Montgomery was duly elected circuit clerk of Faulkner County at the general election in November, 1930, and duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. On June 1, 1931, the grand jury of Faulkner County returned three indictments against him, charging him with the offense of embezzlement, alleged to have been committed while he was treasurer of Faulkner County prior to the beginning of his term as circuit clerk. On the return of the indictments, the circuit court suspended him from office under the provisions of 10,335 of Crawford Moses' Digest. Immediately after making the order, the court adjourned until the next term, which will commence on the first Monday in November, 1931. R. A. Nowell was temporarily appointed in his place under the provision of 10,338 of the Digest. The parties have agreed that the above statement is a correct copy of the record in the matter.

The order of the circuit court was wrong. In Jacobs v. Parham, 175 Ark. 86, 298 S.W. 483, it was held that each term of office is a separate entity and that 10.335 of the Digest does not provide for the suspension of an indicted officer except for offenses committed during the term and that suspension may not be had for official misconduct during the prior term of office for which he may be indicted. That case rules the present proceedings, and it may be said that in 46 C.J., at page 986, the author says that offenses committed during a previous term of office are generally held not to furnish cause for removal. It follows that the order of the circuit court suspending H. W. Montgomery from the office of circuit clerk must be quashed, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Nowell

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 22, 1931
183 Ark. 1116 (Ark. 1931)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Nowell

Case Details

Full title:MONTGOMERY v. NOWELL

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 22, 1931

Citations

183 Ark. 1116 (Ark. 1931)
40 S.W.2d 418

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Turner v. Earle

ehart, 158 Fla. 267, 28 So.2d 589 (1946); In re Proposed Disciplinary Action by the Florida Bar Against a…

State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Wymore

rger, 106 Mo. 135; State v. Frazier, 98 S.W.2d 707; State v. Layton, 58 S.W.2d 454; State v. McEwan, 120…