Montgomery v. Montgomery

Full title: Kenneth B. Montgomery, Respondent, v. Ellen R. Montgomery, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 12, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2013-000377 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000377 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-060

02-12-2014

Kenneth B. Montgomery, Respondent, v. Ellen R. Montgomery, Appellant.

James R. Snell, Jr., and Jennifer M. Clinkscales, both of the Law Office of James R. Snell, Jr., LLC, of Lexington, for Appellant. Ryan W. Lane, of The Lane Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge

AFFIRMED

James R. Snell, Jr., and Jennifer M. Clinkscales, both of the Law Office of James R. Snell, Jr., LLC, of Lexington, for Appellant.

Ryan W. Lane, of The Lane Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Sanderson v. Sanderson, 391 S.C. 249, 255, 705 S.E.2d 65, 67 (Ct. App. 2010) ("A point not specifically raised to and ruled upon by the [family] court will not be considered on appeal."); Doe v. Roe., 369 S.C. 351, 375-76, 631 S.E.2d 317, 330 (Ct. App. 2006) ("An issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the [family court] to be preserved for appellate review."); id. at 376, 631 S.E.2d at 330 ("An issue is not preserved where the [family] court does not explicitly rule on an argument and the appellant does not make a Rule 59(e)[, SCRCP,] motion to alter or amend the judgment."). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.