From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Clayton Homes, Inc

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Mar 25, 2003
65 F. App'x 508 (5th Cir. 2003)

Summary

finding no grounds for equitable tolling under Texas law when plaintiff "was unable to obtain the services of a lawyer to pursue his claims"

Summary of this case from Ahmadi v. Pool

Opinion

02-10791

March 25, 2003, Decided


Affirmed


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Clayton Homes, Inc

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Mar 25, 2003
65 F. App'x 508 (5th Cir. 2003)

finding no grounds for equitable tolling under Texas law when plaintiff "was unable to obtain the services of a lawyer to pursue his claims"

Summary of this case from Ahmadi v. Pool

analyzing Equal Pay Act and Title VII claims

Summary of this case from Lindsley v. TRT Holdings, Inc.

analyzing Equal Pay Act and Title VII claims

Summary of this case from Lindsley v. TRT Holdings, Inc.

In Tanner, the notice of deficiency was based on unreported income from the exercise of stock options which was supported by a corporate filing.

Summary of this case from In re Berg
Case details for

Montgomery v. Clayton Homes, Inc

Case Details

Full title:Montgomery v. Clayton Homes, Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 25, 2003

Citations

65 F. App'x 508 (5th Cir. 2003)
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8192

Citing Cases

Fairley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). See Plemer v. Parsons-Gilbane, 713 F.2d 1127, 1136 (5th Cir. 1983); Montgomery…

United States v. Fulton

See In re Bradford, 660 F.3d 226, 228–29 (5th Cir.2011) (per curiam); Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 863–64…