From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Byers

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1862
21 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1862)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Fifteenth Judicial District.

         Application for a writ of assistance by the same party and in the same action as in the preceding case of Montgomery v. Middlemiss. Pending the foreclosure action the plaintiff therein conveyed to one of the defendants, Margaret L. C. Wilson, his interest in a portion of the mortgaged premises, and the respondents purchased from her with notice of the pendency of the action before the entry of the decree of foreclosure, and being in possession of the portion thus purchased resisted the application of the plaintiff for a writ of assistance. The application was denied by the District Court, and the plaintiff appeals.

         COUNSEL:

         Geo. Cadwallader, for Appellant.

          Belcher & Belcher, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Norton, J. concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The respondents purchased of one of the defendants after the commencement of the action, and with notice of its pendency. They occupy, therefore, the precise position of their grantor. In other respects the case is covered by the decision in Montgomery v. Middlemiss, (ante, 103.) Upon that authority the order of the District Court must be reversed, and that Court directed to issue a writ of assistance as prayed in the petition of the plaintiff.

         Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Byers

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1862
21 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1862)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Byers

Case Details

Full title:MONTGOMERY v. BYERS et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1862

Citations

21 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1862)

Citing Cases

Landregan v. Peppin

When, therefore, as in this case, it has been adjudicated that defendant has no adverse claims or interests…

Havemeyer v. Superior Court

There could be no valid purchase by persons with actual notice of the pending suit, though no notice of lis…