From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montes v. Frauenhiem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2020
Case No. 2:17-cv-01432-JGB-JC (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-01432-JGB-JC

02-26-2020

JESSE JAMES MONTES, Petitioner, v. SCOTT FRAUENHIEM, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to this Court's Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ADJUDGED. DATED: February 26, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Montes v. Frauenhiem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2020
Case No. 2:17-cv-01432-JGB-JC (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Montes v. Frauenhiem

Case Details

Full title:JESSE JAMES MONTES, Petitioner, v. SCOTT FRAUENHIEM, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-01432-JGB-JC (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

Sosa v. Warden of Corcoran State Prison

When, as here, the claim to be exhausted is not cognizable on federal habeas or plainly meritless, “a stay…

Magee v. Smith

Regardless, neither Rhines nor Kelly support staying a petition when the claim to be exhausted is not…