From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montanez v. Jeffrey M. Brown Assocs., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 16, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2014-03456, Index No. 10504/06.

09-16-2015

Raul MONTANEZ, plaintiff, v. JEFFREY M. BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., defendants; Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., nonparty-appellant; Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., nonparty-respondent.

 Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Nicole Miklos of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se. Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., Hauppauge, N.Y., nonparty-respondent pro se.


Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Nicole Miklos of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., Hauppauge, N.Y., nonparty-respondent pro se.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, SHERI S. ROMAN, and SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.

Opinion In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, nonparty Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated January 29, 2014, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of nonparty Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., in effect, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475 to impose a charging lien against certain settlement proceeds to the extent of directing Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., to disburse to Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., the sum of $43,471.02, representing 20% of a contingency fee of $217,355.08.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the sum to be disbursed to Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., from $43,471.02 to $21,735.51, representing 10% of the contingency fee of $217,355.08; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant.

At a hearing, Edmond C. Chakmakian, the principal of nonparty Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., testified that he commenced this action on behalf of the plaintiff against a general contractor to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a construction accident. He handled the case through the initial stages of discovery. At the hearing, Chakmakian was asked how much time he spent preparing the “plaintiff's response to combined demands,” and in response, he testified, “[i]f you want me to estimate, I would say the entire package, with the bill of particulars, response [to combined demands], my demand, so forth, probably [a] day and a half.” His representation of the plaintiff terminated approximately 10 months after the action was commenced.

In contrast, the evidence adduced at the hearing demonstrated that nonparty Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C. (hereinafter SAM), spent a significant amount of time on the case. SAM added defendants to the action, conducted discovery, including depositions, conducted motion practice, and proceeded to mediation over a period of approximately 4 ½ years.

Although Chakmakian laid the groundwork for this action and the plaintiff's recovery, in view of the relative time spent by him as compared with SAM, the award to Law Offices of Edmond C. Chakmakian, P.C., of 20% of the contingency fee of $217,355.08 was an improvident exercise of discretion. We therefore reduce the award to 10% of the contingency fee (see Matter of Sucheron, 95 A.D.3d 892, 944 N.Y.S.2d 173 ; Catinella v. Mecca & Son Trucking Corp., 90 A.D.3d 966, 934 N.Y.S.2d 849 ).


Summaries of

Montanez v. Jeffrey M. Brown Assocs., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 16, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Montanez v. Jeffrey M. Brown Assocs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Raul MONTANEZ, plaintiff, v. JEFFREY M. BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

131 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
16 N.Y.S.3d 304
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6791

Citing Cases

Pyong Woo Ye v. Pasha

Here, Andrew Park elected to receive a contingent percentage fee at the conclusion of this action. Given the…

Lamanna v. Compitiello

Here, Krentsel Guzman rendered legal services and stipulated to receiving a contingent percentage fee at the…