From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montague v. Graybeal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
Feb 27, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-148 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-148

02-27-2020

CHARLES MONTAGUE, Plaintiff, v. ED GRAYBEAL, JR., JOHN DOE/JANE DOE, CAPT. LOWE, and WASHINGTON COUNTY, TENN., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Cynthia R. Wyrick

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This pro se prisoner's civil rights action asserting a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court, sua sponte, for consideration of dismissal.

On February 3, 2020, this Court entered an order revoking Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and requiring Plaintiff to remit the full $400.00 filing fee to the Court within fourteen days. (Doc. 68.) On February 12, 2020, the Court received a fee payment of $100.00 from Plaintiff. (Doc. 69.) The Court has consulted with its financial department and has been advised that no other funds from Plaintiff have been received in satisfaction of the filing fee in this action.

The Court previously received two payments from Plaintiff in partial satisfaction of the filing fee in a prior civil action filed by Plaintiff. See Montague v. Schofield, No. 2:14-cv-292 (E.D. Tenn.). Because Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in each separate civil action he initiates, his payments in the prior case are irrelevant to the satisfaction of the filing fee in this cause.

Section 1983 litigants who are not proceeding in forma pauperis must pay a total fee of $400.00 to file suit (350.00 filing fee and a $50.00 administrative fee). See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)- (b). This fee is due upon initiation of the suit. See In re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 381-82 (6th Cir. 2002) (finding prisoner's obligation to pay filing fee arises when complaint delivered to district court clerk). The Court finds that Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee necessary to sustain this action, and accordingly, the instant action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In light of the Court's ruling, Defendants' pending motions to dismiss (Docs. 56, 64) will be DENIED AS MOOT. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT WILL ENTER.

/s/ Travis R. McDonough

TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Montague v. Graybeal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
Feb 27, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-148 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Montague v. Graybeal

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES MONTAGUE, Plaintiff, v. ED GRAYBEAL, JR., JOHN DOE/JANE DOE, CAPT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

Date published: Feb 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-148 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2020)