From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mondry v. Maloney

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 19, 1971
185 N.W.2d 520 (Minn. 1971)

Opinion

No. 42172.

March 19, 1971.

Animals — action for injuries from dog bite — provocation.

Action in the Ramsey County District Court brought on behalf of James M. Mondry, a minor, by Howard J. Mondry, his father and natural guardian, for personal injuries allegedly resulting from being bitten by defendant's dog; and by said Howard Mondry on his own behalf for consequential damages. The case was tried before Otis H. Godfrey, Jr., Judge, and a jury, which returned a verdict for defendant, and plaintiffs appealed from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Affirmed.

Swanson Christoffersen and Allen G. Christoffersen, for appellants.

Robert W. Gislason, for respondent.

Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Murphy, Peterson, Kelly, and Odden, JJ.


This is a dog-bite action by plaintiffs James M. Mondry, a child, and Howard J. Mondry, his father, against Donald J. Maloney, owner of a dog, brought pursuant to Minn. St. 347.22, which provides in part:

"If a dog, without provocation, attacks or injures any person who is peaceably conducting himself in any place where he may lawfully be in any urban area, the owner of the dog is liable in damages to the person so attacked or injured to the full amount of the injury sustained."

Plaintiffs moved for judgment notwithstanding the jury's verdict for defendant or for a new trial, on the sole ground that, as a matter of law, there was no provocation for the dog to bite plaintiff child. The motion was denied.

We hold that whether provocation existed was an issue of fact properly submitted to the jury under appropriate instructions in the words of the statute. The sole testimony to support plaintiffs' burden of proof was the uncontradicted testimony of plaintiff child. But the jury was not compelled to give full credit to his testimony without considering either the internal inconsistencies in the testimony or the external inferences of improbability to be drawn from the physical facts and circumstances disclosed by the record. Backman v. Fitch, 272 Minn. 143, 137 N.W.2d 574.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mondry v. Maloney

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 19, 1971
185 N.W.2d 520 (Minn. 1971)
Case details for

Mondry v. Maloney

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. MONDRY, A MINOR, BY HOWARD J. MONDRY, HIS FATHER AND NATURAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 19, 1971

Citations

185 N.W.2d 520 (Minn. 1971)
185 N.W.2d 520

Citing Cases

Bailey by Bailey v. Morris

We have held provocation to be an issue of fact properly submitted to the jury. Mondry v. Maloney, 289 Minn.…