From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mollison v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 5, 2009
No. CIV S-08-0994 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0994 JAM EFB P.

May 5, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 25, 2009, respondents requested an extension of time until April 26, 2009, to reply to petitioner's opposition to the motion to dismiss. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). On April 24, 2009, respondent filed a reply.

Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that respondent's March 25, 2009, request is granted and the April 24, 2009, reply is accepted as timely.


Summaries of

Mollison v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 5, 2009
No. CIV S-08-0994 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Mollison v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GLENN MOLLISON, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW MARTEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0994 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

Menjivar v. Frauenheim

Several courts have rejected equitable tolling in similar circumstances. See, e.g., LaCava v. Kyler, 398 F.3d…

Dominguez v. Brazelton

ng equitable tolling); see also Randle v. Crawford, 604 F.3d 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2010) (state-appointed…