From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molinares v. Adler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 18, 2011
450 F. App'x 564 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-16009.

Submitted July 12, 2011.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

July 18, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 1:09-cv-01964-OWW.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Federal prisoner Victor Figueroa Molinares appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Molinares contends that the Bureau of Prisons violated his due process rights by incorrectly calculating his time served credits. Specifically, Molinares contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction for the time served on an unrelated federal offense. The record reflects that Molinares already received all credit for time served that he was entitled to. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); see also Allen v. Crabtree, 153 F.3d 1030, 1033 (9th Cir. 1998) (noting that section 3585(b) disallows double crediting of time served).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Molinares v. Adler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 18, 2011
450 F. App'x 564 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Molinares v. Adler

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR FIGUEROA MOLINARES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEIL ADLER, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 18, 2011

Citations

450 F. App'x 564 (9th Cir. 2011)