From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohawk Indus. v. Williams

U.S.
Jun 5, 2006
547 U.S. 516 (2006)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 05-465.

Argued April 26, 2006. Decided June 5, 2006.

Certiorari limited to Question 1 dismissed; certiorari granted; 411 F. 3d 1252, vacated and remanded.

Carter G. Phillips argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Richard D. Bernstein, Juan P. Morillo, and Steven T. Cottreau. Howard W. Foster argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John E. Floyd, Joshua F. Thorpe, Ronan P. Doherty, Bobby Lee Cook, and Matthew Thames. Malcolm L. Stewart argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Fisher, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Sangita K. Rao.

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. by Beth S. Brinkmann, Seth M. Galanter, Alison Tucker, Robin S. Conrad, and Amor D. Sarwal; and for the National Association of Manufacturers et al. by Michael J. Mueller, Jan S. Amundson, and Quentin Riegel.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the Immigration Political Action Committee et al. by Barnaby W. Zall; and for the National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys by Kevin P. Roddy and G. Robert Blakey.


The writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, granted at 546 U. S. 1075 (2005), is dismissed as improvidently granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., ante, p. 451.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Mohawk Indus. v. Williams

U.S.
Jun 5, 2006
547 U.S. 516 (2006)
Case details for

Mohawk Indus. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WILLIAMS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 5, 2006

Citations

547 U.S. 516 (2006)
126 S. Ct. 2016
126 S. Ct. 2014
164 L. Ed. 2d 771

Citing Cases

Williams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.

After oral argument, however, the Supreme Court entered a summary, three-sentence order that (1) dismissed…

Williams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari as to the first question, but then dismissed the petition as…