From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohanna v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 24, 2022
21-cv-03605-DMR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-03605-DMR

03-24-2022

KEYHAN MOHANNA, Plaintiff, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge

The court previously dismissed Plaintiff's wrongful foreclosure lawsuit for failure to prosecute after Plaintiff did not file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 23.] After Plaintiff moved for reconsideration, the court reopened the case on the basis of excusable neglect, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), and directed Defendant to re-file its motion. [Docket No. 26]. However, the court warned Plaintiff that in light of his long history of failing to adhere to filing deadlines to prosecute his cases, including before this court, he must file and serve his opposition brief within fourteen days after Defendant re-files its motion. Plaintiff was further warned that his failure to file a timely opposition could result in dismissal. Id.

See, e.g., Mohanna v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 21-cv-3797-DMR, 2021 WL 4079210, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2021), appeal dismissed, No. No. 21-16673 (9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2022) (ECF No. 4); Mohanna v. Carrington Mortg. Servs. LLC, No. 18-cv-2563-WHO, 2018 WL 5778354, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2018), appeal dismissed, No. 18-17288, 2019 WL 6449209 (9th Cir. Nov. 7, 2019); Mohanna v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 16-cv-1033-HSG, 2017 WL 976015 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2017) (denying motion for default judgment); see also HSBC Bank USA N.A. v. Mohanna, No. A151378, 2020 WL 4745248 (Cal.Ct.App. Aug. 17, 2020) (unpublished).

Defendant duly re-filed its motion to dismiss and certified that it served Plaintiff with it by mail on March 1, 2022. [Docket Nos. 27, 29.] Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff had until March 15, 2022 to file his opposition brief or statement of non-opposition. Nothing has been filed. Accordingly, the court again dismisses this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The pending motion to dismiss is terminated, and the April 14, 2022 hearing on the motion is vacated. The Clerk shall close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mohanna v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 24, 2022
21-cv-03605-DMR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Mohanna v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

Case Details

Full title:KEYHAN MOHANNA, Plaintiff, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 24, 2022

Citations

21-cv-03605-DMR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2022)