From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Modderno v. King

U.S.
Jan 21, 1997
519 U.S. 1094 (1997)

Summary

holding that an independent claim based on cumulative error exists only when the individual errors involved matters of constitutional dimension; the errors were not procedurally defaulted; and the errors so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process

Summary of this case from SOSA v. DRETKE

Opinion

No. 96-6159.

January 21, 1997, October TERM, 1996.


C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 82 F. 3d 1059.


Summaries of

Modderno v. King

U.S.
Jan 21, 1997
519 U.S. 1094 (1997)

holding that an independent claim based on cumulative error exists only when the individual errors involved matters of constitutional dimension; the errors were not procedurally defaulted; and the errors so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process

Summary of this case from SOSA v. DRETKE
Case details for

Modderno v. King

Case Details

Full title:MODDERNO v. KING, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 21, 1997

Citations

519 U.S. 1094 (1997)

Citing Cases

Acker v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Further, the Fifth Circuit has held that "[m]eritless claims or claims that are not prejudicial cannot be…

Wright v. Director

When considering the reasonableness of counsel's conduct, a court must indulge a strong presumption that it…