upholding the imposition of sanctions on a defendant who resubmitted a motion that had been previously denied
Summary of this case from Davis v. GoodeNo. 91-1881.
October 5, 1992, October TERM, 1992.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 950 F. 2d 1209.
upholding the imposition of sanctions on a defendant who resubmitted a motion that had been previously denied
Summary of this case from Davis v. Goodeaffirming Rule 11 sanctions even though district court erred in denying original motion to dismiss, because district court did not impose sanctions for substance of defendant's motion, but rather because making the subsequent motion at that juncture, given Local Rule 3(j) and the law of the case doctrine, was not justified by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law
Summary of this case from Wechsler v. Hunt Health Systems, Ltd.recognizing that a claim "relates to a plan" when the very essence of the claim is premised on the existence of an employee benefit plan
Summary of this case from Humana, Inc. v. Shrader & Assocs., LLPFull title:MOBIL OIL CORP. ET AL. v. CHRISTOPHER ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 5, 1992
"To prevail on a defamation claim, a party must show publication of a false statement of fact, as opposed to…
37712, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Liquor ControlSee Village of Hoffman Est. v. Flipside, Hoffman Est., 455 U.S. 489, 494 n. 5 (1982). No essential issues of…