From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MLM v. Karamouzis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2388.

December 4, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 15, 2002, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Martin P. Desmery, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrew P. Karamouzis, for Defendant-Respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin, JJ.


An owner/shareholder is not individually liable for the torts of a corporation unless it is established that he exercised complete dominion over the corporation alleged to have committed the wrong ( Brito v. DILP Corp., 282 A.D.2d 320). We reject plaintiff's claim that defendant, a principal of the restaurant corporation, engaged in allegedly tortious conduct, for which he should be held individually responsible. Such conduct amounts, at most, to nonfeasance, for which defendant is not liable ( Michaels v. Lispenard Holding Corp., 11 A.D.2d 12, 14).

Furthermore, plaintiff failed to demonstrate the requisite elements of a claim for breach of fiduciary duty.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

MLM v. Karamouzis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

MLM v. Karamouzis

Case Details

Full title:MLM LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOTIRIOS KARAMOUZIS, Defendant-Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 620

Citing Cases

Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.

That he acted solely in his capacity as an officer of the Corporation is not a sufficient ground for…

Robles v. Palazzolo Realty Corp.

Hanover is the president of defendant Palazzolo Realty Corp., the owner of the premises. The conduct…