From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Langley

U.S.
Oct 2, 2006
549 U.S. 903 (2006)

Summary

In Mitchell v. Langley, 143 Ga. 827, 85 S.E. 1050, Lumpkin, J., at p. 1053, says: "Is it possible that where a will has been made, leaving a devise, a third person can fraudulently and maliciously cause the testator to revoke the devise, and thus cause a loss to the devisee, without any redress on the part of the latter?

Summary of this case from Bohannon v. Trust Co.

Opinion

No. 06-5226.

October 2, 2006.

Reported below: 172 Fed. Appx. 900.


Certiorari Denied.

C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Langley

U.S.
Oct 2, 2006
549 U.S. 903 (2006)

In Mitchell v. Langley, 143 Ga. 827, 85 S.E. 1050, Lumpkin, J., at p. 1053, says: "Is it possible that where a will has been made, leaving a devise, a third person can fraudulently and maliciously cause the testator to revoke the devise, and thus cause a loss to the devisee, without any redress on the part of the latter?

Summary of this case from Bohannon v. Trust Co.
Case details for

Mitchell v. Langley

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL v. LANGLEY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2006

Citations

549 U.S. 903 (2006)
127 S. Ct. 227

Citing Cases

Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Whiten

Blalock v. Waldrup, 84 Ga. 145 (2) ( 10 S.E. 622). See also Mitchell v. Langley, 143 Ga. 827 (2) ( 85 S.E.…

Morgan v. Morgan

The trial court denied the motion and we granted her interlocutory appeal to determine whether the complaint…