From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Dragoo

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 24, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-05436-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10-cv-05436-RBL-JRC.

August 24, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, objections thereto [Dkt. #40] and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff has thirty days from entry of this order to provide additional briefing as to his cell phone and phone list claims. No new issues should be included in that briefing and no new parties may be added to the action. Defendants will then have thirty days to file a motion or otherwise respond. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Creatura.
(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, and to the Hon. J. Richard Creatura.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Dragoo

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 24, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-05436-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Dragoo

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. M. DRAGOO et al. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10-cv-05436-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Aug. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

Merrick v. Shinn

Moreover, prisoners do not enjoy unfettered access to the internet. Nickerson v. Gootkin, No. CV…