From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mishalove v. Goldfarb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 13, 1999
260 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 13, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


Defendants' submissions established without contradiction that plaintiff was terminated from employment on August 10, 1990, and the complaint alleged termination in 1990. Accordingly plaintiff's action for breach of an alleged employment agreement, commenced on April 15, 1997, was barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations period for contract actions (CPLR 213). Plaintiff has not alleged any facts that might serve to toll the running of the Statute of Limitations. Leave to file an amended complaint was properly denied inasmuch as the Statute of Limitations remained as a bar to the causes of action alleged therein.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Mishalove v. Goldfarb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 13, 1999
260 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Mishalove v. Goldfarb

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT C. MISHALOVE, Appellant, v. DAVID GOLDFARB et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 628

Citing Cases

Waheed v. Habib Bank Ltd.

The parties' submissions established without contradiction that plaintiff's employment was terminated on…

Waheed v. Habib Bank Ltd.

The parties' submissions established without contradiction that plaintiff's employment was terminated on…