Opinion
October 18, 1928.
November 14, 1928.
Brokers — Real estate brokers — Rental commission — Affidavit of defense — Sufficiency.
In an action of assumpsit by a real estate broker to recover rental commissions, the claim was based on an oral contract whereby defendant agreed to give plaintiff one-half the rental commissions derived by the former from an unexpired lease on a certain building. Defendant in its affidavit of defense averred that it had not received any such commissions and that an action for their recovery had been instituted. In such case the affidavit of defense was sufficient to prevent judgment.
Appeal No. 288, October T., 1928, by plaintiff from order of M.C., Philadelphia County, February T., 1928, No. 74, in the case of J. Howard Minster, Jr., v. Blair, Inc., a corporation.
Before HENDERSON, TREXLER, KELLER, LINN, GAWTHROP and CUNNINGHAM, JJ. Affirmed.
Assumpsit by a real estate broker for commissions. Before WALSH, J.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The court discharged the rule. Plaintiff appealed.
Error assigned was the order of the court.
Thomas C. Egan, and with him Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, for appellant.
Thomas F. Gain, for appellee.
Argued October 18, 1928.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit.
The action was brought by one real estate broker against another for a share of rental commissions alleged to be due him.
The claim is based on an oral agreement, confirmed by letter, as follows:...... "Therefore, as set forth in our recent conversation, we agree to give you one-half the commission, namely, three per cent of the monthly rental, as set forth in the lease, same to be paid to you monthly until termination of said lease, while we are custodians of same or rental agent for this building. In the event of the lease being assigned by us to the owners or their agents, we further agree to give you one-half of the commission derived by this office for the unexpired term of the lease."
Plaintiff admitted the receipt of one-half of all monthly commissions received by defendant while it was rental agent of the building, but sued for one-half the commissions which he alleged accrued to the defendant on its assignment of the lease to the owner in compliance with the latter's demand. The defendant denied liability to the plaintiff for such commissions, or any agreement to pay the same, until it had received them, averring that an action for their recovery had been brought against the owner and was still pending in the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County to No. 19, March Term, 1928.
After full consideration of the statement and affidavit of defense, in the light of the arguments of counsel for the parties, we agree with the court below that the right of the plaintiff to a summary judgment on the pleadings and without a trial has not been established. We do not reverse the court below in such cases unless it is clear and free from doubt that the court erred in refusing judgment. Following the practice of the Supreme Court (Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143; Brown v. Unger, 269 Pa. 471) and of this court, we shall not discuss the applicable rules of law until an opportunity is had to develop the facts at trial.