From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minsky v. Baitelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1953
281 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

March 30, 1953.


Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 1 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and from an order granting plaintiff's motion to examine defendant before trial. Orders reversed on the law, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with $10 costs, and motion to examine before trial denied, without costs. Respondent seeks damages for personal injuries sustained when a freight elevator in which he was riding dropped in a building owned by appellant. It is undisputed that the latter is a partner of the firm which employed respondent, that the firm's place of business was in the building, and that the firm procured compensation insurance for its employees, including respondent. Appellant's ownership of the building did not alter the relationship of employer which he had towards respondent. Because compensation insurance has been provided, the respondent has no right of action at law against appellant by reason of his negligence in the maintenance of the freight elevator. ( Williams v. Hartshorn, 296 N.Y. 49.) Carswell, Acting P.J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Minsky v. Baitelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1953
281 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Minsky v. Baitelman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MINSKY, Respondent, v. SAMUEL BAITELMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1953

Citations

281 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.

She contends that that rule is compatible with the development of New York's law of strict liability in tort…

Billy v. Consolidated Mach

Reed v The Yaka, 373 U.S. 410; Duprey v Shane, 39 Cal.2d 781; Smith v Metropolitan Sanitary Dist., 77 Ill.2d…