From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minorco v. Consolidated Gold Fields PLC

U.S.
Sep 5, 1989
492 U.S. 939 (1989)

Summary

finding standing where target of an acquisition would lose independence because of injury occurring in the market; relied on in holding that a competitor-plaintiff has standing to challenge a merger in a market into which the plaintiff sought to expand ( see Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. v. May Dep't Stores Co., 881 F. Supp. 860, 878 (W.D.N.Y. 1994))

Summary of this case from Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.

Opinion

No. 88-2063.

September 5, 1989.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 53. Reported below: 871 F. 2d 252.


Summaries of

Minorco v. Consolidated Gold Fields PLC

U.S.
Sep 5, 1989
492 U.S. 939 (1989)

finding standing where target of an acquisition would lose independence because of injury occurring in the market; relied on in holding that a competitor-plaintiff has standing to challenge a merger in a market into which the plaintiff sought to expand ( see Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. v. May Dep't Stores Co., 881 F. Supp. 860, 878 (W.D.N.Y. 1994))

Summary of this case from Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.
Case details for

Minorco v. Consolidated Gold Fields PLC

Case Details

Full title:MINORCO v. CONSOLIDATED GOLD FIELDS PLC ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Sep 5, 1989

Citations

492 U.S. 939 (1989)

Citing Cases

Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.

UCC Opp.Mem. (Shell/Montell) at 6 (citing Cplt. ¶¶ 105-17, 196-212, 234-37). UCC has properly pled facts…

Moore Corp. v. Wallace Computer Servs.

D.I. 22, pp. 2, 13-14. See Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v. Minorco, S.A., 871 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert.…