From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minnick v. Minnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 25, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.).


Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff only limited relief. We note that plaintiff remains free to seek to avail herself of any of the full panoply of sanctions provided for in CPLR 3126 if she believes the circumstances warrant a further request for relief as discovery proceeds. We simply hold that the specific order appealed from did not result from an abuse of discretion. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Minnick v. Minnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Minnick v. Minnick

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA MINNICK, Appellant, v. F. WENDELL MINNICK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Oi Tai Chan v. Society of Shaolin Temple, Inc.

Similarly, all remaining discovery exchanges are to be conducted before or with the assistance of a special…

Keingarsky v. Keingarsky

The record demonstrates that the plaintiff disobeyed court orders directing her to answer the defendant's…