From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minieri v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 27, 1994

Appeal from the Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Following a Tier III disciplinary hearing, claimant was found guilty of charges stemming from his alleged participation in a prison demonstration at Attica Correctional Facility. He was sentenced to 730 days' confinement in a Special Housing Unit (SHU) and to loss of various privileges. At the disciplinary hearing, the Hearing Officer refused to view a videotape of the demonstration, which claimant asserted would exonerate him. Because of the Hearing Officer's refusal to view the videotape, the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services reversed the determination and vacated claimant's sentence. By then, claimant had served 204 days in the SHU. Claimant was not released until 40 days after the reversal. The Court of Claims awarded claimant $7 per day in damages for the 40 days' confinement, but refused to award damages for the 204 days' confinement preceding the reversal.

We reject claimant's contention that the Court of Claims erred in failing to award damages for the period of claimant's confinement in the SHU prior to reversal of the Superintendent's determination. Corrections personnel are entitled to absolute immunity for those "discretionary decisions in furtherance of general policies and purposes where the exercise of reasoned judgment can produce different acceptable results" (Arteaga v State of New York, 72 N.Y.2d 212, 219). The Hearing Officer's refusal to view the videotape was a discretionary decision made while he was acting in a quasi-judicial role and is afforded absolute immunity. Claimant's confinement in the SHU prior to the reversal of the determination is, therefore, not compensable.

We conclude, however, that the record supports an award of $10 per day in damages (see, Mesick v. State of New York, 118 A.D.2d 214, 219-220, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 611; Koester v. State of New York, 90 A.D.2d 357, 363-365), and modify by increasing claimant's award of damages to $400 plus interest at the statutory rate (see, CPLR 5004).


Summaries of

Minieri v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Minieri v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MINIERI, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 510

Citing Cases

James v. State

The administrative reversal of the disciplinary findings alone, without proof of a violation of…

Tisdale v. State

Typically, the issue comes down to whether the confinement was privileged, and this case is no different.…