From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mineo v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 13, 1998

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Summary Judgment.)

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment. Qualification of an expert is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Meiselman v. Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389, 398-399; Kletnieks v. Brookhaven Mem. Assn., 53 A.D.2d 169, 175), and that discretion was not abused in this case (cf., Daum v. Auburn Mem. Hosp., 198 A.D.2d 899). The court properly rejected defendant's contention that plaintiff's expert, a physician specializing in radiology, was not competent to render an expert opinion with respect to the treatment of plaintiff's decedent by defendant, an orthopedic surgeon (see, Fuller v. Preis, 35 N.Y.2d 425, 431; DaRonco v. White Plains Hosp. Ctr., 215 A.D.2d 339, 340; Behan v. Data Probe Intl., 213 A.D.2d 439, 440-441).


Summaries of

Mineo v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Mineo v. Young

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MINEO, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of ROBIN E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 152

Citing Cases

Willett v. Schneidermesser

In support of her motion for summary judgment, the appellant submitted her deposition testimony in which she…

Pares v. LaPrade

Plaintiffs presented proof that plaintiff's pain and the limitations on plaintiff's activities will continue…