Milos v. Exxon Co., USA

Full title: WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 1996

671 A.2d 120 (N.J. 1996)

671 A.2d 120

Opinion

Argued January 29, 1996 —

Decided February 22, 1996.

Richard V. Jones argued the cause for appellant ( Bressler, Amery Ross, attorneys).

Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for respondent ( Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder Montalbano, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J. Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.

Opposed — none.