From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milner v. J.H. Lewis Son

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 12, 1925
104 So. 444 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 206.

May 12, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.

Action in detinue for a piano by J.H. Lewis Son against George I. Milner. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

H.G. Bailey, of Boaz, for appellant.

Testimony that plaintiffs owned the property was a conclusion of the witness, and should have been excluded.

J.P. Brown, of Boaz, for appellees.

There was no error in admission of testimony.


The first two assignments of error relate to the rulings of the court in permitting plaintiff to testify that he and his son were the owners of the piano in question. This did not call for a conclusion, but was testimony as to a fact. A witness may properly testify as to who is the owner of personal property. Daffron v. Crump, 69 Ala. 77; Steiner v. Tranum, 98 Ala. 315, 13 So. 365; Rasco v. Jefferson, 142 Ala. 705, 38 So. 246.

The cause was tried before the court without a jury. The evidence was taken ore tenus, and was conflicting. Under these conditions the presumptions are in favor of the findings of the trial court, which this court will not disturb unless such findings are contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Kiser Co. v. Pope, 18 Ala. App. 54, 88 So. 197; Schlossburg v. Willingham, 17 Ala. App. 678, 88 So. 191.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Milner v. J.H. Lewis Son

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 12, 1925
104 So. 444 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Milner v. J.H. Lewis Son

Case Details

Full title:MILNER v. J.H. LEWIS SON

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 12, 1925

Citations

104 So. 444 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
104 So. 444

Citing Cases

Ramsey v. McMillan

The presumption is in favor of the order and decree rendered by the probate court after full hearing of the…

Long v. Doegg

The finding of the probate judge on evidence ore tenus is like the verdict of a jury, and will not be…