From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1935
182 S.E. 336 (N.C. 1935)

Opinion

(Filed 1 November, 1935.)

Pleadings D b — Action held properly dismissed upon demurrer for misjoinder of parties and causes of action.

An action against insurer to reform plaintiff's fire insurance policy and to upset settlement and recover an additional sum under the policy as reformed, and against plaintiff's mortgagee to restrain foreclosure and recover rents, is defective in that the several causes do not affect all parties to the action, and the action is properly dismissed upon demurrer for misjoinder of parties and causes. C. S., 507.

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Small, J., at September Term, 1935, of PITT.

P. R. Hines and Julius Brown for plaintiffs.

Lewis G. Cooper for defendant Insurance Company.


Civil action (1) to reform fire insurance policy issued by the Virginia Fire and Marine Insurance Company, (2) to upset settlement and recover additional sum under said policy, as reformed, for fire loss, and (3) to restrain foreclosure and recover rents from the North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank.

Demurrer interposed for misjoinder of both parties and causes; sustained; exception; appeal.


Plaintiffs have incorporated three causes of action in the same complaint. The first two arise out of the insurance policy issued by the Virginia Fire and Marine Insurance Company; the other is based on a deed of trust given to secure a loan from the North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank. The several causes do not affect all the parties to the action. C. S., 507. The complaint, therefore, is bad as against a demurrer. Atkins v. Steed, ante, 245, and cases there cited.

Dual misjoinder of parties and causes works a dismissal upon demurrer. Carswell v. Whisenant, 203 N.C. 674, 166 S.E. 793; Shuford v. Yarbrough, 198 N.C. 5, 150 S.E. 618; Shemwell v. Lethco, 198 N.C. 346, 151 S.E. 729; Bank v. Angelo, 193 N.C. 576, 137 S.E. 705; Shore v. Holt, 185 N.C. 312, 117 S.E. 165.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mills v. Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1935
182 S.E. 336 (N.C. 1935)
Case details for

Mills v. Bank

Case Details

Full title:ROLAND MILLS AND CHARLOTTE MILLS v. THE NORTH CAROLINA JOINT STOCK LAND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1935

Citations

182 S.E. 336 (N.C. 1935)
182 S.E. 336

Citing Cases

Wingler v. Miller

It is well settled that the sustaining of a demurrer on that ground requires the dismissal of the action.…

Shore v. Holt

Remanded. Cited: Evans v. Davis, 186 N.C. 46; Brock v. Brock, 186 N.C. 55; Weaver v. Kirby, 186 N.C. 391;…