Opinion
May 15, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Dickinson at the Supreme Court. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Miller v. Soeker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1989
150 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Summaries of
Miller v. Soeker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1989
150 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for
Miller v. Soeker
Case Details
Full title:CHARLES J. MILLER, JR., Respondent, v. HENRY SOEKER, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: May 15, 1989
Citations
150 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
541 N.Y.S.2d 122
Citing Cases
Wasserman v. City of New York
See, e.g., Eisenbach v. Rogers, 158 A.D.2d 792, 551 N.Y.S.2d 385, 386 (App.Div.3d Dep't 1990); Morowitz v.…
Prinsilma v. Williams"Mere speculation that the defendant may have failed to take some unspecified accident-avoidance measures or…