From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MILLER v. NOE

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 18, 1968
432 S.W.2d 818 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968)

Summary

In Miller v. Noe, 432 S.W.2d 818 (Ky.App. 1968), plaintiff took an indeterminate voluntary leave of absence to work for the American Federation of Teachers without the consent of the school board.

Summary of this case from Overton v. Board of Education

Opinion

October 18, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Chancery Branch, First Division, Jefferson County, Dan Marshall, J.

William Friedlander, Louisville, for appellant.

Henry A. Triplett, Hogan, Taylor, Denzer Bennett, Louisville, for appellees.


The question upon this appeal is: Does a teacher who voluntarily absents himself from duty without a leave of absence from the school board vacate his position as a teacher under the teachers' tenure act, KRS 161.790? We believe he does.

Appellant, Richard L. Miller, was employed as a teacher by the Board of Education of Louisville, Kentucky. For the 1965-66 school year he was assigned to the Manly Junior High School as a full-time teacher. During the months of December, 1965, and January, 1966, he requested a leave of absence in order to work full time for the American Federation of Teachers. On January 14, 1966, he appeared before the Board requesting a leave of absence and his request was unanimously denied. He then discontinued his teaching duties on February 14, 1966, and commenced working full time for the Federation at a salary equivalent to that which he had been paid by the Board. Much of the proof in this case and argument of the briefs filed by counsel is concerned with whether or not appellant intended to return to the teaching profession either upon the expiration of a definite period of time or at some indefinite date. We believe this to be immaterial. KRS 161.720(4) provides:

"The term 'continuing service contract,' shall mean a contract for the employment of a teacher which shall remain in full force and effect until the teacher resigns or retires or reaches the age of 65 or until it is terminated or suspended as provided in KRS 161.790 and 161.800." (Emphasis added).

We believe an act of resignation occurred when the teacher took an indeterminate voluntary leave of absence without the consent of the Board. Welch v. Board of Education of Magoffin County, Ky., 247 S.W.2d 536; Marshall v. Conley, Ky., 258 S.W.2d 911; 47 Am.Jur. 395, Schools, Sec. 138. The school board was under no obligation to take appellant back after he voluntarily absented himself from his position.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.


Summaries of

MILLER v. NOE

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 18, 1968
432 S.W.2d 818 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968)

In Miller v. Noe, 432 S.W.2d 818 (Ky.App. 1968), plaintiff took an indeterminate voluntary leave of absence to work for the American Federation of Teachers without the consent of the school board.

Summary of this case from Overton v. Board of Education

In Noe v. Miller, 31 N. J. Eq. 234, the bequest was: "To my daughter Elizabeth M. Noe, wife of John Noe, one share, in addition to what she has already had; her said husband not to have any control of the said legacy, but to be hers and her child's or children's forever.

Summary of this case from Gordon v. Jackson
Case details for

MILLER v. NOE

Case Details

Full title:Richard L. MILLER, Appellant, v. Samuel V. NOE et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Oct 18, 1968

Citations

432 S.W.2d 818 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Desmond v. MacNeill

Evidently the testator had it in mind that there was to be a difference between mother and children in…

Wellford v. Snyder

Held, that the principal of the sum bequeathed to a daughter, who never married, vested in her absolutely,…