applying this principle, this Court drew its own conclusion, differing from that of the district court, on whether a wage differential was based on factors other than sex
Summary of this case from Block v. PotterNo. 1386.
May 18, 1970.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 425 F. 2d 1074.
applying this principle, this Court drew its own conclusion, differing from that of the district court, on whether a wage differential was based on factors other than sex
Summary of this case from Block v. Potterapplying Georgia law
Summary of this case from Bowling v. Ansted Chrysler-Plymouth-DodgeFull title:MILLER v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 18, 1970
" Congress, "in prescribing `equal' work did not require the jobs be identical, but only that they must be…
Thompson v. SawyerThe legislative history thus contains ammunition both for those who would insist on a very narrow reading of…