From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. McClure

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 22, 1999
745 A.2d 1162 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

No. A-60-98.

Argued November 29, 1999.

Decided December 22, 1999.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 326 N.J. Super. 558 (1998).

Gregory D. Saputelli argued the cause for appellant (Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell Hippell, attorneys; Kimberly D. Sutton, on the brief).

Wendy L. Mager argued the cause for respondent Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher Brennan, attorneys; Ms. Mager and Susan L. Olgiati, on the brief).

Robert M. Smolen argued the cause for respondent Huron Insurance Company (Swartz, Campbell Detweiler, attorneys).

Michael J. Marone argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Re Insurance Company (McElroy, Deutsch Mulvaney, attorneys; John T. Coyne, on letter in lieu of brief).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 326 N.J. Super. 558 (1998).

CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, and VERNIERO join in this PER CURIAM opinion.


Summaries of

Miller v. McClure

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 22, 1999
745 A.2d 1162 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

Miller v. McClure

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McCLURE, Individually and as a…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 22, 1999

Citations

745 A.2d 1162 (N.J. 1999)
745 A.2d 1162

Citing Cases

Molla v. Adamar of N.J., Inc.

In other words, "[i]f plainly expressed, the insurers are entitled to have liability limitations construed…

Hampton Med. Group v. Princeton Ins. Co.

"[E]xclusions are presumptively valid and will be given effect if `specific, plain, clear, prominent, and not…