From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Irwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 1994
202 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 29, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


The testimony of plaintiff's attorney that he personally reserved the summons and complaint at a deposition satisfied plaintiff's burden of establishing proper service by a preponderance of the credible evidence (see, Powell v. Powell, 114 A.D.2d 443). We find no reason to disturb the IAS Court's findings crediting the testimony of plaintiff's attorney and discrediting the contrary testimony of defendant.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Miller v. Irwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 1994
202 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Miller v. Irwin

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA MILLER, Respondent, v. JACK IRWIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 780

Citing Cases

Miloslavskaya v. Gokhberg

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for leave to enter a default judgment. While the…

Home Federal Savings Bank v. Mahood

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the defendants' contentions, the plaintiff…