From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Goodhue-Rice-Wabasha Cit. Action Council

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 21, 1972
197 N.W.2d 424 (Minn. 1972)

Opinion

No. 43234.

April 21, 1972.

Workmen's compensation — compensable injuries — injuries sustained by physically handicapped employee.

Certiorari upon the relation of Goodhue-Rice-Wabasha Citizens Action Council, Inc., employer, and Western Casualty and Surety Company, its insurer, to review a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Commission awarding benefits against said relators to Elmer Miller, employee. Affirmed.

Carroll, Cronan, Roth Austin and Thomas A. Foster, for relators.

Smith Schreiber, Jerome A. Schreiber, and Dennis H. Weber, for respondent.

Heard before Murphy, Peterson, Kelly, and Nelson, JJ.


Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Commission affirming findings and determination of the compensation judge awarding employee temporary total disability. Employer and insurer contend that compensation should have been denied on the ground that the injury giving rise to the disability did not arise out of and in the course of employee's employment.

It appears from the record that employee, Elmer Miller, age 57, was a physically handicapped person employed by the Goodhue-Rice-Wabasha Citizens Action Council, Inc., for light cleanup work at the marina in Lake City, Minnesota. As a result of a birth injury, he suffered from epilepsy and also from atrophy of his left hand, arm, and leg. On May 8, 1969, on his return from lunch, while ascending steps at the premises where he was employed, his left leg "locked" and he fell, fracturing his hip. On March 20, 1970, while walking with a cane, and while still recovering from the injury of May 8, 1969, his leg again "locked" in the same manner, causing him to fall and again fracture the left hip, as a result of which there was further hospitalization and disability.

The record fairly supports the determination of the Workmen's Compensation Commission that, even though employee's handicap may have been a factor in the original fall, the injury resulting therefrom was nevertheless compensable under Stenberg v. Raymond Co-op. Creamery, 209 Minn. 366, 296 N.W. 498 (1941), and Barlau. v. Minneapolis-Moline P. I. Co. 214 Minn. 564, 9 N.W.2d 6 (1943), and that the second fall and injury were consequential, occurring by reason of a condition resulting from the first injury, and therefore compensable.

Employee is allowed $250 attorneys' fees.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Goodhue-Rice-Wabasha Cit. Action Council

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 21, 1972
197 N.W.2d 424 (Minn. 1972)
Case details for

Miller v. Goodhue-Rice-Wabasha Cit. Action Council

Case Details

Full title:ELMER MILLER v. GOODHUE-RICE-WABASHA CITIZENS ACTION COUNCIL, INC., AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 21, 1972

Citations

197 N.W.2d 424 (Minn. 1972)
197 N.W.2d 424

Citing Cases

Workers' Comp. Court of Appeals v. Cmty. Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n

But this strained reading is undone by the same paragraph in Kirchner from which the quotation is drawn. That…

Kirchner v. County of Anoka

The "arising out of" requirement refers to the causal connection between the employment and the injury. This…