From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 14, 1934
152 Misc. 24 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

June 14, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Joseph Spencer [ Harry R. Wilson of counsel], for the appellant.

James E. Turner, for the respondent.


The complaint herein sounded solely in contract, although the damages sought were for personal injuries arising out of breach of a warranty implied in connection with the sale of food for human consumption. In view of the comprehensive language of the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 480) we think that interest was properly allowed on the verdict from the date of the breach to the date of trial.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, CALLAHAN, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 14, 1934
152 Misc. 24 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE H. MILLER, Appellant, v. FOLTIS FISHER, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 24 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
271 N.Y.S. 263

Citing Cases

E. R. Squibb & Sons Inter-American Corp. v. Springmeier Shipping Co.

( Will Co. v. Canadian Nat. Ry. Co., 216 A.D. 239; Kaufman v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 47 N.Y.S.2d 639.) But…

Hall v. Florida Greyhound Lines

Plaintiffs' causes of action undoubtedly rest in contract and in view of the comprehensive language of…