From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Farmers Merchants Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 14, 1963
131 S.E.2d 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

40125.

DECIDED MAY 14, 1963.

Action for damages. Chattooga City Court. Before Judge Maddox from Floyd City Court.

Fullbright Duffey, Harl C. Duffey, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Robert Edward Surles, contra.


This is a slip-down case in which a verdict was directed in favor of the defendant bank. Error is assigned on direction of the verdict in the sole special ground of the motion for new trial, which was overruled. Held:

The petition alleged actual and constructive knowledge that the bank floor where plaintiff fell was "covered in oily, greasy and slick film of wax." Actual knowledge was not shown on the trial but in fact was denied by the defendant's president. Neither was constructive knowledge shown because there was no evidence as to how long the alleged condition had existed before plaintiff fell. In the absence of such proof, it is well settled that there can be no inference of constructive notice. See, e.g., Watson v. Citizens c. Bank, 103 Ga. App. 535 ( 120 S.E.2d 62) and citations; Setzers Super Stores v. Higgins, 104 Ga. App. 116 (1), 121 ( 121 S.E.2d 305); Home Fed. Savings c. Assn. v. Hulsey, 104 Ga. App. 123 ( 121 S.E.2d 311). The motion for directed verdict was properly granted and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial is

Affirmed. Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 14, 1963.


Summaries of

Miller v. Farmers Merchants Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 14, 1963
131 S.E.2d 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Miller v. Farmers Merchants Bank

Case Details

Full title:MILLER v. FARMERS MERCHANTS BANK

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 14, 1963

Citations

131 S.E.2d 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
131 S.E.2d 211

Citing Cases

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Redding

There was no evidence as to who placed it there or even as to how long it had been there on that day. See…