From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Eagle Tug Boat Companies

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Dec 8, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 09-0401-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Dec. 8, 2009)

Summary

accepting factual allegations in complaint as true and denying defendant's motion to dismiss a Title VII claim on the grounds that plaintiffs sued the wrong employer

Summary of this case from Townsend v. Autozone Stores, Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 09-0401-CG-B.

December 8, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) be DENIED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Eagle Tug Boat Companies

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Dec 8, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 09-0401-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Dec. 8, 2009)

accepting factual allegations in complaint as true and denying defendant's motion to dismiss a Title VII claim on the grounds that plaintiffs sued the wrong employer

Summary of this case from Townsend v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
Case details for

Miller v. Eagle Tug Boat Companies

Case Details

Full title:JERRY MILLER, et al., Plaintiff, v. EAGLE TUG BOAT COMPANIES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 8, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 09-0401-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Dec. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Tuck v. off Shore Inland Marine & Oilfield Co.

See also Lewis v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 2010 WL 4398155, *2 (11th Cir. Nov. 8, 2010) ("Generally, a party…

Townsend v. Autozone Stores, Inc.

After accepting the allegations set forth in the Amended Complaint as true, the Court concludes that…