From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2019
No. 2:19-cv-0237 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-0237 TLN KJN P

03-20-2019

DANTE MILLER, aka D'ANTE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed February 13, 2019, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty-day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: March 20, 2019

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /mill0237.fusm


Summaries of

Miller v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2019
No. 2:19-cv-0237 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Miller v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:DANTE MILLER, aka D'ANTE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-0237 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2019)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Colgan

The state board of examiners, when sitting as a board of audit, is a judicial body. (Cahill v. Colgan (Cal.…

Cahill v. Colgan

In Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 N.Y. 222, the court said: " The acts of a board of audit, within its…