From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. City of New York, Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1944
54 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1944

Decided March 2, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, CHURCH, J.

Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel ( Murray Sendler and James Hall Prothero of counsel), for defendant City of New York, appellant.

Solomon Pearlman and Paul W. Hessel for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Austin B. Mandel for defendant-respondent.


On appeal by the City of New York: Judgment affirmed, with costs.

On plaintiff's appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the appeal was never perfected. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. Taking no part: THACHER, J.


Summaries of

Miller v. City of New York, Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1944
54 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Miller v. City of New York, Fitzgerald

Case Details

Full title:ANNA MILLER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN T…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 2, 1944

Citations

54 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1944)
54 N.E.2d 690

Citing Cases

Sofka v. State of New York

) In the meantime the Legislature, in a general revision of the Court of Claims Act, had incorporated the…

Sofka v. State of New York

) In the meantime the Legislature, in a general revision of the Court of Claims Act, had incorporated the…