From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Brown Ship-Building Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 27, 1948
165 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1948)

Opinion

No. 12097.

January 27, 1948.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas; Thomas M. Kennerly, Judge.

Action by William Paul Miller and another, suing for themselves and approximately 800 other persons similarly situated, against Brown Shipbuilding Company to recover wages allegedly due. From a judgment, 71 F. Supp. 672, dismissing the action, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

Chris Dixie, of Houston, Tex., for appellants.

J.A. Rauhut, of Austin, Tex., and C.E. Bryson, Brian S. Odem, U.S. Atty., and W.F. Lehigh, Asst. U.S. Atty., all of Houston, Tex., for appellee. Contra.

Before SIBLEY, WALLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.


Jurisdiction of a federal district court is not presumed, and the complaint must, as against a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, allege facts showing jurisdiction. The complaint here does not with sufficient clearness show what the controversy is and that the court has jurisdiction over it. The judgment of dismissal for this cause is affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Brown Ship-Building Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 27, 1948
165 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1948)
Case details for

Miller v. Brown Ship-Building Co.

Case Details

Full title:MILLER et al. v. BROWN SHIP-BUILDING CO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 1948

Citations

165 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1948)

Citing Cases

Sekerez v. U.S. Reduction Co.

"In the federal courts jurisdiction of the subject matter must be affirmatively pleaded, and in the absence…

Cooper et al. v. Co. Bd. of Review

Since Rule TR. 12 is substantially a carbon copy of Federal Rule 12, certain federal procedures apply to a…