From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millennium Med. Diagnostics v. Liberty Mut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04653

Argued May 23, 2003.

June 16, 2003.

In an action to recover no-fault medical payments under an insurance contract, the defendant appeals, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated December 6, 2001, which reversed an order of the Civil Court, Queens County (Walker, J.), entered March 7, 2001, and denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Carman, Callahan Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (James M. Carman, Michael F. Ingham, and Cheryl D. Reuter of counsel), for appellant.

Dash Berger, Jericho, N.Y. (Robert E. Dash of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Term properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to summary judgment, as the defendant failed to proffer sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any triable issues of fact (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851; Ayyub v. Smith, 291 A.D.2d 864).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Millennium Med. Diagnostics v. Liberty Mut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Millennium Med. Diagnostics v. Liberty Mut

Case Details

Full title:MILLENNIUM MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS, P.C., ETC., respondent, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Stephen Fogel Psychological v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Accordingly, we conclude that an insurer is entitled to request an IME upon the receipt of a notice of claim,…

Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Accordingly, we conclude that an insurer is entitled to request an IME upon the receipt of a notice of claim,…